If you build or run a video conferencing platform, don’t fall for the advice to “just get SOC 2 done.” That approach overlooks the security and compliance challenges unique to real-time communications.

Video conferencing companies do far more than a typical SaaS business. They route real-time audio and video through TURN/STUN relays. These companies  store recordings and transcripts that may contain biometric-adjacent voiceprints and facial data. They operate multi-region infrastructure to reduce latency. They also support enterprise uptime SLAs that customers expect them to meet every minute.

Choosing the right SOC 2 consultants for video conferencing companies matters. The right partner helps you implement controls that reflect how your platform actually works. As a result, your SOC 2 report gives security teams confidence instead of raising questions during procurement.

Why Video Conferencing Companies Need Specialized SOC 2 Consultants

Generic SOC 2 guidance doesn’t account for the complexities of real-time communications platforms. Video conferencing companies need consultants who understand WebRTC architecture, high-availability infrastructure, sensitive meeting data, and complex third-party integrations.

Specialized SOC 2 consultants for video conferencing companies help design controls for uptime, secure recordings and transcripts, manage subprocessors, meet enterprise compliance expectations, and validate encryption claims. Their expertise leads to a more accurate audit and a SOC 2 report that builds trust with customers and speeds up procurement.

The Top 12 Best SOC 2 Consultants for Video Conferencing Companies

1. Vanta 

Vanta is the most widely adopted compliance automation platform in the market, and for a video conferencing company scaling quickly across multiple cloud regions, its integration depth is a genuine advantage. It connects to 300–400+ tools, including AWS, GCP, Azure, Okta, and GitHub, and automates continuous evidence collection so your engineering team isn’t manually screenshotting TURN server configs every quarter.

Features

  • Automated evidence collection
  • Continuous control monitoring
  • Extensive integration library
  • Multi-framework support for SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, and HIPAA
  • Vendor risk management workflows
  • Trust center for sharing your security posture with enterprise prospects

Pros

  • Fast to implement
  • Broad integration coverage
  • Familiar to most CPA firms, making audits smoother
  • Well suited for teams without dedicated compliance staff

Cons

  • Pricing can increase significantly at renewal as you add users or compliance frameworks
  • Functions as a compliance readiness platform rather than a CPA firm, so you’ll still need to hire a licensed auditor

Pricing

Quote-based
Typically ranges from $10,000 to $30,000+ per year, depending on company size, compliance frameworks, and selected modules.

Verdict: A strong default choice among SOC 2 consultants for video conferencing companies that want speed and integration breadth without heavy hand-holding, provided you pair it with an auditor who understands real-time media infrastructure.

2. Drata 

Drata is built for technically mature teams that want deep, code-level automation rather than guided hand-holding. For a video conferencing company with a strong DevOps culture managing Kubernetes-based media servers and CI/CD pipelines, Drata’s granular control mapping and continuous monitoring fit naturally into existing engineering workflow

Features

  • Continuous control monitoring across 200+ integrations
  • Real-time audit hub for auditor collaboration
  • Granular control-to-evidence mapping
  • Multi-framework support for SOC 2, ISO 27001, and NIST

Pros

  • Powerful automation capabilities
  • Ideal for organizations pursuing multiple compliance frameworks simultaneously
  • Intuitive, polished user interface
  • Robust trust center for sharing security information

Cons

  • Steeper learning curve than more guided platforms
  • Best suited for teams with internal security or DevOps expertise to manage configuration
  • Less suitable for organizations seeking a fully managed compliance experience

Pricing

Quote-based
Typically starts at around $9,000 per year and increases based on company size and the number of compliance frameworks.

Verdict: One of the better SOC 2 consultants for video conferencing companies with in-house engineering capacity that wants to “manage compliance in code” rather than outsource the operational lift.

3. Secureframe

Secureframe positions itself for teams that want structure and human support alongside automation. For a video conferencing startup without a dedicated compliance hire, Secureframe’s compliance specialists can walk your team through control implementation rather than leaving you to interpret AICPA language alone.

Features

  • Automated evidence collection
  • Built-in employee security awareness training
  • Personnel and access tracking
  • Security questionnaire automation
  • Support for emerging frameworks such as ISO 42001 and NIST AI RMF, making it well suited for platforms with AI transcription or meeting summary features

Pros

  • Guided onboarding experience
  • Dedicated customer success and compliance specialists
  • Strong support for multiple compliance frameworks
  • Early adoption of AI governance frameworks compared to many competitors

Cons

  • Smaller integration library than Vanta or Drata
  • Smaller auditor network than leading competitors
  • Bundled advisory services may duplicate the work of an external compliance consultant

Pricing

Approximately $7,000 to $60,000 per year, depending on company size and service tier.

Verdict: A good fit among SOC 2 consultants for video conferencing companies that are pursuing SOC 2 alongside AI-specific compliance questions from enterprise buyers evaluating AI meeting features.

4. Sprinto 

Sprinto has built its reputation on speed and price, particularly for early-stage teams that don’t want to negotiate platform and audit as two separate purchases. It automates both technical and operational controls with tiered alerting, and several of its packages bundle the audit itself rather than leaving you to shop for a CPA firm separately.

Features

  • Predefined, guided compliance workflows
  • Continuous monitoring of automated and manual controls
  • 300+ integrations
  • Bundled audit and penetration testing options in select plans
  • Multi-region billing support for international teams

Pros

  • More affordable than Vanta or Drata for similar core compliance features
  • Faster path to audit readiness for first-time SOC 2 teams
  • Structured workflows reduce complexity and decision fatigue

Cons

  • Smaller integration ecosystem may require more manual work for custom systems
  • Less flexible for organizations with advanced or non-standard compliance needs
  • May not scale as well for video conferencing platforms with complex media server architectures

Pricing

Approximately $8,000 to $20,000 per year for typical SaaS deployments.

Verdict: One of the most cost-efficient SOC 2 consultants for video conferencing companies still early in their growth stage, as long as your infrastructure is reasonably standard cloud architecture.

5. Scrut Automation

Scrut competes directly with Sprinto on price while offering stronger account coverage for teams operating across India, EMEA, and Latin America,  a common pattern for video conferencing companies with distributed engineering teams and global customer bases.

Features

  • Automated evidence collection
  • Cloud security posture management for AWS, Azure, and GCP
  • Misconfiguration detection
  • Risk register
  • Multi-framework compliance support at a lower cost than many US-based competitors

Pros

  • Cost-effective for budget-conscious teams
  • Strong integration coverage
  • Regional account support for customers outside the US

Cons

  • Smaller auditor network than Vanta or Drata
  • Lower brand recognition among enterprise buyers, particularly in the US
  • US enterprises may be less familiar with its compliance evidence and reporting

Pricing

Approximately $8,000 to $15,000 per year for a typical SaaS deployment.

Verdict: A smart pick among SOC 2 consultants for video conferencing companies with globally distributed teams that need strong support outside the US market without paying US-leader pricing.

6. Schellman & Company

Schellman is a licensed CPA firm not a readiness platform  and one of the few audit firms in the country holding SOC, ISO 27001 certification body status, HITRUST assessor status, PCI QSA authorization, and FedRAMP 3PAO accreditation simultaneously. For a video conferencing company selling into government, defense, healthcare, or financial services, that “single provider, many frameworks” model can materially simplify your compliance roadmap as you add ISO 27001 or HITRUST later.

Features

  • Issues SOC 2 reports under AICPA attestation standards
  • Fixed-fee audit engagements
  • Draft reports typically delivered within three weeks of fieldwork completion
  • Supports multiple frameworks, including SOC, ISO, FedRAMP, HITRUST, and PCI

Pros

  • Strong CPA firm reputation with enterprise procurement teams
  • Fast turnaround for an audit firm of its size
  • Well suited for video platforms serving telehealth, government, or other regulated industries

Cons

  • Premium pricing compared to many alternatives
  • Focuses on auditing rather than compliance readiness
  • Typically requires pairing with a platform such as Vanta, Drata, or Secureframe for automated evidence collection

Pricing

Not publicly disclosed
Industry estimates for a SOC 2 Type II audit typically range from $20,000 to $100,000, depending on scope and the number of frameworks included

Verdict: Among SOC 2 consultants for video conferencing companies, Schellman is the strongest choice once your platform is being evaluated by enterprise, healthcare, or government buyers who scrutinize the auditor’s name as closely as the report itself.

7. A-LIGN

A-LIGN runs one of the highest-volume SOC 2 practices in the US, having completed over 11,600 audits, and bundles SOC 2 with ISO 27001, HITRUST, FedRAMP, and PCI DSS under a single engagement. For a video conferencing company planning to stack multiple frameworks as it moves upmarket, that breadth reduces the coordination overhead of managing separate auditors.

Features

  • Multi-framework audit and advisory services
  • Support for SOC 2, ISO 27001, HITRUST, FedRAMP, and PCI DSS
  • Broad familiarity with leading GRC and compliance platforms
  • Services covering readiness assessments through formal SOC 2 attestation

Pros

  • Extensive experience across major compliance frameworks
  • Strong familiarity with a wide range of GRC tools
  • Suitable for startups, growth-stage companies, and enterprises
  • Simplifies compliance by supporting multiple frameworks under one provider

Cons

  • Less personalized experience than smaller boutique firms
  • Premium pricing for organizations pursuing only a SOC 2 audit

Pricing

  • Quote-based
  • Generally priced similarly to or slightly below Coalfire and Schellman for comparable audit scope

Verdict: A dependable choice among SOC 2 consultants for video conferencing companies planning to add ISO 27001, HITRUST, or PCI DSS to their compliance roadmap without switching auditors each time.

8. BARR Advisory

BARR Advisory has built a specific niche around growth-stage SaaS companies running primarily on AWS, which makes it a natural fit for video conferencing platforms whose media servers, TURN relays, and recording storage all live in the same cloud environment. BARR’s team treats cloud-native evidence as the default case rather than a special exception.

Features

  • SOC 2 Type I and Type II audit services
  • Cloud-first audit methodology
  • Deep experience auditing AWS-native environments, including containers, auto-scaling groups, and managed services
  • Translates modern cloud architectures into audit-ready evidence without relying on legacy on-premises frameworks

Pros

  • Strong expertise in modern cloud infrastructure
  • Reduces audit delays and back-and-forth during fieldwork
  • Well suited for video conferencing platforms built entirely on AWS and other cloud-native technologies

Cons

  • Lower brand recognition outside the AWS-focused SaaS market
  • Less suitable for organizations with complex hybrid or multi-cloud environments spanning AWS, Azure, and GCP

Pricing

Not publicly disclosed
Typically estimated at $20,000 to $45,000 for a SOC 2 Type II engagement

Verdict: One of the better-fit SOC 2 consultants for video conferencing companies built entirely on AWS infrastructure, since the audit team won’t need a crash course in your architecture before fieldwork can start.

9. Johanson Group

Johanson Group is one of the most startup-friendly SOC 2 CPA firms in the market, known for fixed-fee engagements and fast turnaround, Type 1 reports can be issued in as little as one to three weeks for companies already running a platform like Drata, Vanta, Secureframe, or Rippling.

Features

  • SOC 2 Type I and Type II attestation services
  • Evidence requirements tailored to small engineering teams
  • Structured audit engagements designed for startups and growing companies

Pros

  • Fixed, predictable pricing
  • Well suited for engineering teams with five to thirty members
  • Hands-on involvement from senior partners throughout the engagement
  • Practical audit process that doesn’t assume enterprise-scale compliance programs

Cons

  • Limited support for advanced frameworks such as FedRAMP and HITRUST
  • Less suitable for organizations managing multiple compliance frameworks simultaneously
  • Smaller team capacity may limit flexibility for large or rapidly scaling engagements

Pricing

  • Fixed-fee pricing
  • Typically ranges from $12,000 to $25,000 for a first SOC 2 Type I or Type II engagement, depending on scope.

Verdict: Among SOC 2 consultants for video conferencing companies at seed or Series A stage, Johanson Group offers one of the fastest, least bureaucratic paths to a first report.

10. Coalfire

Coalfire is primarily known for FedRAMP 3PAO and PCI DSS QSA work, and its SOC 2 practice, while substantial, carries a federal-compliance premium that shows up even in pure commercial engagements. For a video conferencing company eyeing government contracts, defense-adjacent customers, or payment-handling features, Coalfire’s single-vendor path from SOC 2 through FedRAMP or CMMC can be worth the premium.

Features

  • SOC 2 attestation services
  • FedRAMP authorization support
  • CMMC assessment readiness through Coalfire Federal
  • PCI DSS QSA services
  • Unified support for multiple compliance frameworks as your requirements grow

Pros

  • Extensive expertise in federal and defense compliance
  • Auditors with strong technical security backgrounds
  • Excellent choice for organizations planning a FedRAMP or CMMC compliance roadmap

Cons

  • Premium pricing compared to many SOC 2-focused audit firms
  • Can be more than is needed for organizations with straightforward SOC 2 requirements

Pricing

  • Approximately $25,000 to $80,000+ for a SOC 2 Type II audit, depending on scope
  • Costs increase significantly when bundled with FedRAMP services.

Verdict: Worth shortlisting among SOC 2 consultants for video conferencing companies specifically because your product roadmap includes government, defense, or payment-processing customers — otherwise, the premium isn’t justified.

11. Insight Assurance 

Insight Assurance has built its reputation on responsiveness and multi-framework execution, which matters for video conferencing companies with distributed, time-zone-spread teams that need an auditor willing to work around asynchronous communication rather than a rigid 9-to-5 engagement model.

Features

  • SOC 2, ISO 27001, and HITRUST audit services
  • Faster-than-average audit communication and response times
  • Flexible scheduling to help meet tight customer contract deadlines

Pros

  • Highly responsive audit team
  • Well suited for organizations working against enterprise procurement timelines
  • Strong support for multiple compliance frameworks

Cons

  • Lower brand recognition than firms like Schellman or A-LIGN among some enterprise procurement teams
  • Smaller firm with a more limited market presence

Pricing

  • Not publicly disclosed
  • Generally positioned in the mid-tier specialist range, with pricing comparable to BARR Advisory and Prescient Security.

Verdict: A solid pick among SOC 2 consultants for video conferencing companies racing against a specific customer contract deadline where auditor responsiveness matters as much as brand name.

12. Prescient Security

Prescient Security sits at the intersection of SOC 2 auditing and application security testing, which is a genuinely useful combination for video conferencing companies whose attack surface includes custom WebRTC signaling servers, SDKs, and public APIs, not just standard cloud infrastructure. Its risk-based approach treats the audit as an opportunity to surface real vulnerabilities, not just a documentation exercise.

Features

  • SOC 2 Type I and Type II attestation services
  • Combined application and cloud security testing
  • Proactive vulnerability identification alongside standard control assessments

Pros

  • Competitive pricing for startups
  • Strong technical expertise for platforms with custom real-time signaling infrastructure
  • Well suited for complex cloud and application environments
  • Security testing adds value beyond a standard SOC 2 audit

Cons

  • Limited capacity for very large or rapidly scaling engagements
  • Lower brand recognition outside security-focused organizations

Pricing

Typically $15,000 to $30,000 for a SOC 2 Type II engagement
Pricing varies based on scope and any additional security testing services

Verdict: One of the more technically rigorous SOC 2 consultants for video conferencing companies that want their audit process to double as a genuine security review of custom WebRTC and signaling infrastructure.

SOC 2 Consultants vs. SOC 2 Auditors: Why the Difference Matters for Video Platforms

Only an AICPA-licensed CPA firm can issue an official SOC 2 report. Compliance automation platforms like Vanta, Drata, Secureframe, Sprinto, and Scrut are readiness tools, they help you collect evidence, monitor controls, and prepare, but they cannot sign the final attestation. CPA firms like Schellman, A-LIGN, BARR Advisory, Johanson Group, Coalfire, Insight Assurance, and Prescient Security are the ones legally authorized to issue the report itself.

Most video conferencing companies end up using both: a readiness platform to automate evidence collection from your cloud infrastructure, and an independent CPA firm to perform the actual examination and sign the report. If you’re evaluating SOC 2 consultants for video conferencing companies and a vendor implies they can both prepare you for the audit and issue the final report themselves, verify their AICPA Peer Review standing before signing anything and be cautious about independence rules if the same firm touched your control design.

Choosing the Best SOC 2 Consultants for Video Conferencing Companies

There’s no single “best” answer here, the right SOC 2 consultants for video conferencing companies depend on your infrastructure, your buyer base, and how many frameworks you’ll need to stack over the next two years.

What matters most is treating SOC 2 as infrastructure work, not paperwork. Get the readiness platform and the CPA auditor working from the same evidence, scope your Availability and Confidentiality criteria around how your product actually behaves in a live call, and choose SOC 2 consultants for video conferencing companies who understand that a dropped connection isn’t just downtime, it’s the whole product failing in front of a customer.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Job alerts

Subscribe to our weekly job alerts below and never miss the latest jobs

Sign in

Sign Up

Forgotten Password

Job Quick Search

Cart

Cart

Share