If you run a project management or collaboration SaaS platform, choosing the right SOC 2 Audit Firms for Project Management Software can help you win enterprise customers. Many large companies require a SOC 2 report before they will even evaluate your product. The report is issued by a licensed CPA firm. It independently verifies that your security controls are not only documented but also work effectively over time.
For project management software, SOC 2 compliance is especially important. Your platform often stores customer roadmaps, internal documents, task histories, sensitive files, and user permissions. A security incident can expose far more than your own business data. It can also put your customers’ confidential information at risk. Working with experienced SOC 2 Audit Firms for Project Management Software helps demonstrate that your controls meet enterprise security standards. It also gives potential customers confidence that their data is protected.
Deciding to get SOC 2 is usually the easy part. Choosing the right SOC 2 Audit Firms for Project Management Software is where most teams get stuck. The market includes traditional CPA firms that focus only on audits. It also includes cloud-native firms built for SaaS companies and compliance automation platforms that combine software with an in-house or partner audit team. Each option follows a different approach, has its own pricing model, and is better suited to certain stages of growth.
Top 12 Best SOC 2 Audit Firms for Project Management Software
1. A-LIGN
A-LIGN describes itself as the top global issuer of SOC 2 reports, working with more than 6,400 organizations across technology, B2B SaaS, and healthcare. The firm operates as a licensed CPA firm (Price and Associates CPAs, LLC, dba A-LIGN Assurance) and also holds accreditation across ISO 27001, FedRAMP, HITRUST, and PCI, which lets it run several audits under one methodology instead of coordinating separate vendors.
Features
- SOC 1, SOC 2, and SOC 3 examinations under one CPA firm
- A-SCEND, an audit-management platform with AI-assisted evidence scoring
- Combined engagements across SOC 2, ISO 27001, HITRUST, FedRAMP, and PCI
Pricing
Custom pricing. Contact sales.
Pros
- Deep experience across nearly every major compliance framework a growing SaaS company might eventually need
- High client volume means auditors have seen a wide range of SaaS architectures
Cons
- Pricing isn’t published, so budgeting requires a sales conversation up front
- A large firm’s process can feel less personal than a boutique shop for a five-person startup
Best Fit
Project management platforms that expect to need ISO 27001, HITRUST, or FedRAMP within a year or two of their first SOC 2, and want one auditor relationship instead of several.
Overall Verdict
A-LIGN is a safe, well-recognized choice, particularly if your roadmap includes government or highly regulated customers down the line. For a lean startup that only needs a single SOC 2 Type I this year, a boutique firm like Johanson Group or Linford & Company will likely be faster to onboard and easier to reach directly.
2. Schellman
Schellman & Company built its practice specifically around SOC examinations before expanding into ISO 27001, FedRAMP, PCI, HITRUST, and CMMC. It’s one of the few firms with Facility Security Clearance, which allows it to perform classified DoD assessments, a differentiator that matters far more to defense contractors than to most SaaS startups, but signals the depth of the firm’s compliance bench generally.
Features
- SOC 1, SOC 2, and SOC 3 examinations from a firm that treats SOC work as its core practice, not a side offering
- In-house team contributing to the AICPA’s SOC 2 working group
- Draft report delivered within roughly two weeks of testing completion, final report within 30 days
Pricing
Custom pricing. Contact sales.
Pros
- SOC examinations are the firm’s founding specialty, not an add-on service
- Fast, predictable reporting timeline once fieldwork concludes
Cons
- No published pricing on the official site
- Best known for government and defense work, which is more capability than most project management SaaS companies need
Best Fit
Growth-stage project management platforms selling into finance, healthcare, or government-adjacent customers who specifically ask for a Schellman-issued report by name.
Overall Verdict
Schellman’s SOC-first focus and fast reporting turnaround make it a strong option once your buyers start asking pointed questions about audit rigor. For an early-stage team whose customers just want to see “we have SOC 2,” a firm like Prescient Assurance or Johanson Group will likely get you there faster and at a lower price point.
3. Coalfire
Coalfire is a Colorado-based cybersecurity and compliance firm founded in 2001. Its SOC practice runs through Coalfire Controls, a licensed CPA affiliate, and the firm reports completing more than 500 SOC assessments annually. Coalfire is also one of the auditors Google Cloud names for its own SOC 2 program, which gives a sense of the scale of infrastructure the firm is used to assessing.
Features
- SOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3, SOC for Cybersecurity, and SOC for Supply Chain
- Compliance Essentials platform for framework mapping and evidence automation
- Roughly 75% of SOC engagements are for cloud service providers (SaaS, IaaS, PaaS)
Pricing
Custom pricing. Contact sales.
Pros
- Extensive experience specifically with cloud service providers, which maps well to a project management SaaS product
- Broad framework coverage (100+) if your compliance needs expand
Cons
- A large firm serving major cloud providers may not prioritize a very small startup’s timeline
- Pricing requires direct engagement; nothing is published
Best Fit
- Project management SaaS companies whose infrastructure sits entirely on AWS, GCP, or Azure and who want an auditor with direct experience assessing those environments at scale.
Overall Verdict
Coalfire’s cloud-provider pedigree is a genuine strength for a modern SaaS company, though its scale and government-adjacent client base (FedRAMP, PCI) may be more than a ten-person startup needs on day one. It’s a strong pick once you’re past your first audit and thinking about a second framework.
4. BARR Advisory
BARR Advisory positions itself specifically for cloud-based organizations running on AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud Platform, and describes its role less as an auditor and more as a security partner, a framing that shows up repeatedly in its own client case studies.
Features
- SOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3, and SOC for Cybersecurity examinations
- Coordinated multi-framework audits (SOC 2 plus ISO 27001) using shared evidence
- Client services team holds certifications including CISA, CISSP, and HITRUST CCSFP
- Key stat worth noting: BARR reports that 40% of its audit reports are delivered ahead of the promised deadline.
Pricing
Custom pricing. Contact sales.
Pros
- Built specifically around cloud-native companies, which fits a modern project management platform closely
- Documented on-time (often early) delivery record.
Cons
- Smaller than A-LIGN or Coalfire, so capacity during peak season could be a scheduling factor
- No public pricing, so early budgeting still requires a sales call
Best Fit
Fast-growing project management SaaS companies fully hosted in the cloud who want a firm that treats cloud evidence as the default case, not a special one.
Overall Verdict
BARR’s cloud-first positioning and reliability on delivery dates make it a strong shortlist candidate for any collaboration or PM tool built entirely on public cloud infrastructure. It’s worth comparing directly against Sensiba and Johanson Group, which serve a similar startup-friendly niche.
5. KirkpatrickPrice
KirkpatrickPrice is a licensed CPA firm with offices across the US, including Atlanta, Tampa, and Nashville, and has completed audits and security assessments for more than 2,000 clients. The firm has issued over 10,000 audit reports across SOC 1, SOC 2, PCI DSS, HIPAA, HITRUST, ISO 27001, and other frameworks, and has publicly worked with SaaS clients including customer engagement and industrial software platforms.
Features
- SOC 1 and SOC 2 audits performed by a PCAOB-registered CPA firm
- Online Audit Manager for tracking evidence requests and progress
- Reports delivered in a machine-readable Markdown format in addition to standard formats
Pricing
Custom pricing. Contact sales.
Pros
- Strong reputation among managed service providers and first-time SOC 2 buyers specifically
- PCAOB registration and PCI QSA accreditation add credibility beyond SOC work alone
Cons
- No published pricing, so comparison shopping requires reaching out directly
- Less name recognition among enterprise SaaS buyers than A-LIGN or Schellman
Best Fit
Project management or collaboration platforms going through their first-ever SOC 2 audit who want a firm known for walking first-timers through the process patiently.
Overall Verdict
KirkpatrickPrice’s education-forward approach and specific experience with MSPs and first-time compliance buyers make it a comfortable choice for a founder who has never been through an audit before. Compare it against Johanson Group if speed is your top priority.
6. Johanson Group LLP
Johanson Group LLP has built a reputation around one thing: fast, fixed-fee audits for early-stage technology companies. The firm is a Drata Alliance Partner and states it leverages 100% of the Drata platform for audits rather than manual spreadsheets, and has publicly announced audit partnerships tied to platforms like Rippling’s compliance product.
Features
- SOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 2+, and SOC 3 examinations
- ISO/IEC 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR services alongside SOC work
- A ten-step, clearly documented SOC 2 audit process published on the firm’s own site
Pricing
Custom pricing. Contact sales.
Pros
- Genuinely fast turnaround relative to the category
- Fixed-fee structure removes hourly-billing uncertainty that worries many founders
Cons
- Smaller firm than A-LIGN, Coalfire, or Schellman, which may matter if your compliance needs grow quickly into multiple frameworks
- Less brand recognition with large enterprise procurement teams
Best Fit
Pre-Series A through Series B project management SaaS startups facing their very first enterprise deal that’s contingent on a signed SOC 2 report.
Overall Verdict
Johanson Group is one of the strongest choices specifically for speed on a first audit. If your roadmap includes ISO 27001 or PCI DSS within the next year, it’s worth confirming the firm can scale with you before committing, since larger multi-framework firms like A-LIGN or Coalfire have deeper bench strength there.
7. Sensiba
Sensiba LLP is a top 100 U.S. accounting and consulting firm. It is widely recommended for SaaS companies, including project management software providers seeking SOC 2 audits. The firm has extensive experience working with VC-backed startups. It also integrates well with compliance automation platforms such as Drata, Vanta, and Secureframe.
For project management software companies, a SOC 2 audit does more than check a compliance box. It shows enterprise customers that your platform can securely handle sensitive task data, internal team communications, project files, and user permissions. That level of assurance can help build trust and shorten enterprise sales cycles.
Features
- SOC 1, SOC 2 Type I and Type II, and ISO/IEC 27001 examinations
- Verified working relationships with Drata, Vanta, Secureframe, and Sprinto
- Most reports delivered within 30 days of the close of the audit period
Pricing
Custom pricing. Contact sales. Sensiba markets fixed-fee pricing at roughly 25–30% below what it describes as competitor rates, though it does not publish specific dollar figures.
Pros
- B Corp status and long operating history add a different kind of credibility for values-conscious buyers
- Deep familiarity with the major compliance automation platforms reduces friction if you’re already on one
Cons
- No exact published pricing, only a general discount claim
- Strong Bay Area roots may matter less if your team and customers are elsewhere
Best Fit
VC-backed project management SaaS companies already running Drata, Vanta, or Secureframe who want an auditor experienced with all three platforms and a B Corp track record.
Overall Verdict
Sensiba’s platform fluency and fixed-fee approach make it a strong candidate for startups that value predictability. It’s a close comparison to BARR Advisory and Johanson Group, the deciding factor often comes down to which platform you’re already using and how your team responds to each firm’s process on a discovery call.
8. Prescient Security
Prescient Security is a technology-focused CPA firm that specializes in SOC 2 audits for B2B SaaS companies, including cloud-based project management software. The firm is a popular choice among scaling businesses and tech startups because of its focus on cloud-native companies.
Prescient Security has supported more than 5,000 customers across over 25 compliance frameworks. Its senior auditors are based across the U.S., EMEA, and APAC. This global presence allows the firm to provide faster, time zone-aligned communication throughout the audit process.
Features
- SOC 1, SOC 2, and SOC 3 examinations, plus ISO 27001, 27701, and 42001 certifications
- Deep integration experience with Vanta and Drata specifically
- Slack-based communication model instead of email-only correspondence
Pricing
Engagements start at approximately $10,000, according to the firm. Exact pricing beyond that entry point is custom. Contact sales.
Pros
- One of the more transparent firms on this list regarding starting price
- Genuinely fast, informal communication style that many startup teams prefer over traditional CPA-firm correspondence
Cons
- The informal, Slack-based style may not suit organizations that require more traditional, documented communication
- Less brand recognition among traditional enterprise procurement teams compared to A-LIGN or Schellman
Best Fit
Project management SaaS startups from Series A through growth stage already running Vanta or Drata who want a fast, low-friction audit experience without switching platforms.
Overall Verdict
Prescient Security’s transparency on starting price and its platform-native workflow make it one of the more startup-friendly names on this list. If your team prefers a more formal, traditional audit relationship, a firm like Linford & Company may be a better cultural fit.
9. Linford & Company LLP
Linford & Company LLP is one of the most respected SOC 2 Audit Firms for Project Management Software. Based in Denver, the CPA firm specializes in SOC 2 audits for SaaS businesses, including project management platforms. Its team works closely with clients to evaluate the AICPA Trust Services Criteria, including Security, Availability, and Confidentiality. This helps ensure your platform meets enterprise expectations for data security and internal controls.
SOC 2 engagements account for about 90% of the firm’s practice. Despite its boutique size, Linford & Company has issued reports relied on by major global brands. The firm is also known for its hands-on approach, with partners actively involved in every engagement.
Features
- SOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3, SOC for Cybersecurity, and SOC for Supply Chain audits.
- HIPAA compliance audits, HITRUST assessments, and FedRAMP support.
- Every auditor has at least 10 years of professional experience.
- High partner involvement throughout each audit, regardless of company size.
- Works with leading SOC 2 compliance automation platforms to simplify evidence collection and review.
- Audit timelines typically range from 4 to 8 weeks.
- Supports both SOC 2 Type I and SOC 2 Type II audits.
Pricing
Linford & Company states that a SOC 2 audit generally costs between $20,000 and $100,000. Pricing depends on factors such as your audit scope, the number of business locations, and the Trust Services Criteria included. The firm provides custom quotes after the initial scoping process.
Pros
- Former Big Four auditor expertise at boutique-firm pricing.
- One of the few firms that publicly shares a realistic SOC 2 pricing range.
- Strong technical expertise with a personalized audit experience.
Cons
Smaller geographic presence than larger firms such as A-LIGN or Coalfire.
The published price range is broad, so a discovery call is still needed for an accurate estimate.
Best Fit
Linford & Company is an excellent choice for project management SaaS businesses that want the technical depth of former Big Four auditors without the complexity of working with a large national firm.
Overall Verdict
Among the leading SOC 2 Audit Firms for Project Management Software, Linford & Company stands out for its transparency, experienced audit team, and partner-led approach. It is a strong mid-market option for software companies that need enterprise-grade audit quality while maintaining close collaboration throughout the engagement.
10. Thoropass
Thoropass (formerly Laika) is one of the few SOC 2 Audit Firms for Project Management Software that combines a compliance automation platform with an in-house CPA firm. Instead of using separate vendors for compliance and auditing, project management SaaS companies can manage the entire process through a single provider.
Thoropass includes AI-powered evidence collection, readiness guidance, and an AICPA-registered, peer-reviewed audit firm under the same organization. This setup removes the typical handoff between a GRC platform and an external auditor. It can also reduce delays and simplify communication throughout the audit.
Features
- Compliance platform supporting SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, HITRUST, and GDPR.
- In-house CPA auditors involved from the beginning of the engagement.
- AI-assisted evidence review to speed up audit preparation.
- More than 200 integrations with tools such as Jira, GitHub, Google Workspace, and AWS.
- Extensive experience auditing B2B SaaS companies, including project management software providers.
Pricing
Thoropass lists compliance platform pricing starting at approximately $8,700 per year. SOC 2 audit subscriptions begin at around $5,800 per year through its AWS Marketplace listing. Final pricing depends on your company size, audit scope, and compliance requirements.
Pros
- A single provider manages both the compliance platform and the audit.
- Eliminates the coordination gap between software and an external CPA firm.
- One of the few providers with publicly available marketplace pricing.
- Strong automation capabilities that reduce manual evidence collection.
Cons
- Some enterprise procurement teams may require a completely separate audit firm. Companies with strict auditor independence policies should verify that Thoropass’s structure meets their requirements.
- Offers fewer third-party integrations than platforms such as Vanta or Drata.
Best Fit
Thoropass is ideal for Pre-Seed, Seed, Pre-Series A, and Series B project management SaaS companies that want one contract, one platform, and one audit partner instead of coordinating multiple vendors.
Overall Verdict
Among today’s SOC 2 Audit Firms for Project Management Software, Thoropass stands out with its all-in-one approach. By combining compliance software with an in-house CPA firm, it simplifies the audit process and reduces administrative overhead. It is an excellent choice for growing SaaS companies that value automation and a single point of contact. Organizations with strict auditor independence requirements should confirm that its related-entity audit model aligns with their procurement policies before moving forward.
11. Vanta
Vanta is not itself a CPA firm and does not issue SOC 2 reports. It’s important to be direct about that distinction, since it’s easy to conflate “compliance platform” with “auditor” in this space. What Vanta does is automate the evidence collection, continuous monitoring, and policy management work that leads up to an audit, then connects you with one of more than 100 partner auditors to actually perform and issue the report.
Features
- Runs more than 1,200 automated tests hourly across connected cloud, identity, and code tools
- Trust Center for sharing security posture and SOC 2 reports with prospects during sales cycles
- AI-assisted policy drafting and security questionnaire responses
Pricing
Custom pricing. Contact sales. Vanta does not publish pricing on its official site.
Pros
- Genuinely reduces the manual evidence-gathering work that traditionally consumes engineering time before an audit
- Broad integration library covering most modern SaaS infrastructure stacks
Cons
- Vanta itself cannot issue your SOC 2 report, you’ll still need to select and pay a separate CPA firm
No published pricing makes early budgeting harder
Best Fit
Project management SaaS companies preparing for their first SOC 2 who want to reduce internal engineering time spent on manual evidence collection, and who plan to pair the platform with one of the CPA firms above.
Overall Verdict
Vanta is a strong choice for the preparation and evidence-automation side of SOC 2, but remember it is a platform, not an auditor. Budget separately for the CPA firm that will actually perform your examination, several firms on this list, including Prescient Security and Sensiba, already work directly inside Vanta’s evidence portal.
12. Drata
Like Vanta, Drata is a compliance automation platform rather than a licensed audit firm, and it does not issue SOC 2 reports itself. Founded in 2020 and based in San Diego, Drata connects to your cloud infrastructure, identity providers, and code repositories to run continuous automated tests against SOC 2 and other framework criteria, then hands evidence off to your chosen auditor through a dedicated collaboration portal.
Features
- More than 300 pre-built integrations across cloud, identity, HR, and code tools
- Trust Center (via its SafeBase acquisition) for sharing compliance posture with prospects
Agentic AI features for vendor risk management and evidence review
Pricing
Custom pricing. Contact sales.
Pros
- Strong integration depth for companies with more complex or varied infrastructure stacks
- Trust Center helps shorten sales cycles by giving prospects self-serve access to compliance documentation
Cons
- Not an audit firm, a separate CPA firm engagement is still required
- No published pricing tiers with dollar amounts, so scoping calls are necessary for budgeting
Best Fit
Growth-stage project management SaaS companies with a more complex tooling environment who want deep integration coverage and are prepared to pair the platform with an independent auditor.
Overall Verdict
Drata’s integration breadth and Trust Center make it a strong platform choice for companies past their earliest stage, particularly once you’re managing more than one framework. As with Vanta, remember to budget separately for the CPA firm that will perform the actual SOC 2 examination.
Conclusion
There isn’t one universal “best” SOC 2 vendor for project management software companies, the right choice depends heavily on your stage, your infrastructure, and what your specific customers are asking for. For companies that want the broadest framework coverage as they scale, A-LIGN and Coalfire stand out. For budget-conscious early-stage teams that need speed above all, Johanson Group and Prescient Assurance are strong picks. Companies already running Vanta or Drata will find natural continuity with auditors like Sensiba or Prescient Assurance, who work directly inside those platforms. And teams that want to avoid the software-to-auditor handoff entirely should take a close look at Thoropass’s bundled model.
Whichever direction you go, treat the decision as a relationship, not a transaction, you’ll be working with this firm annually, and the quality of that ongoing communication matters as much as the report itself.